Better mapping configuration

Hi,
I often need in bigger project use more usable mapping configuration. Two stars are not enough.

In last project I need use more complicated module structure while maintaining PSR but with actual mapping implementation it was not possible.

I think that would be better when mapping works with module and presenter name instead of stars.

1. Use <module> and <presenter> (or any better keywords) in mapping would be better

*: App\<module>Module\<module>\Presenters\<presenter>Presenter

2) The best would be if it were possible to number the modules
Example:

Presenter: One:Two:Three:Four
Mapping: App\<module3>\<module1>\<module2>Module\<module4>
Result presenter class: App\Three\One\TwoModule\Four

I tried implement (1 and 2) into last project as test.
Example is here
My implementation is not good, but it was necessary and work with is quite good.

I would like to see something similar in nette and what are your opinoins?

Edit: module name with number was really wrong idea

Last edited by Budry (2014-06-23 18:33)