- Member | 87
my idea is add a flag to some form controls which i don`t want to obtain in $form->getValues() function.
$form->addText("someInput"); $form->addText("someIgnoredInput") ->setIgnored(); $form->getValues(); // array("someInput" => "value")
Sometimes, I need form controls for eg. spam protection (fake email input, robot-check questions etc…) which I don't want to store to database. Explicit unset after getValues() is IMHO uqly. Function setIgnore() is talk enough, I think.
Is it worth it?
P.S. Don't confuse with setDisabled() function. It's not the same.
//edit: I already have an implementation ready to commit.
Last edited by ZZromanZZ (2013-03-27 10:12)
- Member | 2129
I'm sort of unsure here. I hate the unsets in the onSuccess handlers but I don't think the form declaration is the right place for this. It's not reuseable, imagine that you need same form in several places and each one needs different set of values from the form.
+1 for the idea, –1 for implementation though.
For now I solve this by putting the unwanted fields into a separate container.
- Member | 139
While I'm not sure I really favor this particular implementation, I also
agree that the ubiquitous
unset calls are downright annoying. Since
the purpose of the additional
spambotCheck fields is exclusively to ensure a successful
validation of the form, to a large extent it would make sense if their values
were not included in the
ArrayHash returned by
getValues() as it is supposed to only contain the actual, usable
data. Such behavior would also probably be more consistent with how the method
already acts at this point in time — it does not return the
token, for instance, even though it is also actually a value of a form
field. Although I have no idea how to solve this problem, I am convinced that
it should be acknowledged that these form fields share the same purpose and as
such should be handled identically by the framework.